Category: Thinking Things Through

How many couples, a year after having their first child, are still reckoning with that feeling of having one’s wings clipped? With our third child now six months old, I can still sort of feel some nubs on my back, but referring to wings seems far fetched in and of itself. This hemming in, however, does not strike me as being unique to becoming a parent. I suggest it is more generally associated with aging and the various passages one passes through over the years.

In youth, many feel some sense of a wide open future. That openness erodes over time as one chooses a college, signs up for a major, enters a particular vocation, gets married, etc. In each of these choices, “If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice” (I can’t remember who Rush was quoting, I can only remember the song Free Will). By the time a person is even in his thirties he often looks back at his college or high school days as a time of wide open vistas.

Most people, at some meaningful emotional level, experience a real sense of loss as they realize that they are ever more hemmed in by past decisions, that there are fewer and fewer forks in the road ahead, and that the forks are further and further apart. I’d like to propose, however, that this reaction is misplaced, or at the least needs to be displaced over time.
Continue reading “Clipped Wings”

Last night in our small group, we looked at the parable of the weeds in Matthew 13. I was struck by its relevance to my brother’s line of thought developed in his sermon on I Timothy 3:16, Why Was Jesus Justified. In the application at the end, Mark points out:

Secondly, this might help us understand that, even though we have, in substance, our entire salvation in Jesus Christ, we really are still waiting for it to be revealed. Right now, we look and feel like the wicked around us. We too get cancer and deal with old age, and have our children get sick, and struggle with finances, just like all the unbelievers around us. We too are under the general curse that was imposed on the sinful human race.

The parable makes some radical claims in which Jesus describes what the kingdom of God will be like. Let’s not forget that there were some strong notions regarding the Kingdom that held sway in Israel at that point in history. The Romans would be beaten back. The nations would look to Israel. Israel would be liberated to follow the Torah, separating herself from the pagans according to the various laws. Yet here Jesus says that in the kingdom the wheat and weeds will grow side by side, and that they will be so hard to tell apart that if the servants were to attempt to weed the field (the kingdom), they would uproot wheat along with weeds. This is rather explosive stuff to be saying among a people whose national hope is that they will one day be shown, via their faithfulness to Torah, to be the true people of God when their oppressors are ground under their feet!

Here we are in the kingdom, and as Mark highlights in his sermon, the children of the kingdom look a lot like the children of the enemy. This notion slips away from many as they want to preserve the notion of the kingdom for a time in which evil is put in its place, and that will certainly be the case one day. But Jesus calls this field in which both wheat and weeds grow the kingdom. Though we wait for the day of harvest, we do so in the kingdom. By faith we wait, growing alongside weeds, with a hope of the future harvest, in the present reality of the kingdom.

There are often two distinct levels when discussing an issue of Christian doctrine or practice. There is the level of personal conviction or belief, and the level of perceived interaction with others. For instance, when discussing such an issue as serving alcoholic beverages at a New Year’s Eve party, comments are often made such as “I’m fine with beer and wine, but I would never actually serve them at a group event, since it might cause problems for someone else.” Personal conviction is trumped by a sensitivity or strong responsibility to protect others from their own lack of ethical behavior. In reality, I actually believe that the outward perception is quite informative of the person’s own views, but that is not really my point.

This same sort of movement is made with regard to doctrine, how one expresses them, and what range of liberty is granted in wrestling with a particular doctrine. So, for instance, many people with whom I’ve interacted believe that one cannot discuss obedience as a part of the Christian life without all sorts of disclaimers to ensure justification by faith is not undermined. In many cases, the concern is given expression not in terms of the person’s own view (e.g. that my discussion of obedience is somehow weakening their faith in Jesus) but rather at the broader level, that my carelessly spoken words might cause others to be somehow more inclined to attempt to merit their salvation.

I believe both these concerns, those tied to ethics and those tied to doctrine, are fraught with error because they very pointedly level accusations at Jesus, that he was careless and incompetent.

Continue reading “Disclaimers and Jesus”

My church will soon have access to better classroom facilities and is taking the opportunity to think through our approach to adult Sunday School. A fairly open-ended committee (in terms of participation) has been formed and a questionnaire was sent to all those participating to ensure reasonable preparation prior to the first meeting. I ended up writing a very brief paper prior to actually addressing the questions themselves.

Continue reading “Adult Christian Education”

Hypothesis: Chicken Pot Pie is the American answer to Chinese food.

I was reading through Matthew 11-12 yesterday and picked up on what appears to be a common thread. I have yet to check if there is a larger context to this theme, but it appears a contrast is drawn out between 1) the simplicity of childhood that provides the proper perspective on faith and 2) the sophistication of adulthood that blinds one to the gospel.

Matthew 11 starts with Jesus’ assessment of John the Baptist and culminates with his assessment of his generation. The verdict is offered in terms of children. The ESV makes this jump out by using the word ‘playmates’ instead of ‘others’ in verse 16. A child sings a dirge (John), and the playmates reject him. A child plays a dance (Jesus), and the playmates reject him.

Jesus then condemns cities that had received major signs of power and had rejected the testimony. Lest we vainly try to guess why the testimony was rejected, he immediately offers a telling prayer to the Father, in which he says, “you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.” Thus the child theme from his dialogue on John is brought forward to explain another rejection. John the Baptist was rejected. So too was Jesus’ commencement of the kingdom (i.e. eating and drinking). Now we find out that Jesus’ works of power were ignored as well. In each case, the response of a child would have been appropriate (cry if hurt, dance if happy, stand in awe if a witness to a mighty work).

From here we have the wonderful call to carry his yoke, for he is “gentle and humble in heart.” In the context, I have been trying to understand if there is further understanding to be found by continuing with the child theme. But to see if it might have already come to an end, I looked further into Matthew 12 to see if there were children implied or made explicit. Here’s what it says:

At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. His disciples were hungry and began to pick some heads of grain and eat them. When the Pharisees saw this, they said to him, “Look! Your disciples are doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath.”

It seems to me that the disciples are being purposefully portrayed as childlike in this passage. They were hungry… hey, look, some grain! Let’s eat! The Pharisees then challenge Jesus and receive his rebuttal that “Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.” It appears to me that this story serves as a continuation of the theme in Matthew 11 and confirms that the disciples were ones who mourned at the dirge and danced at the song.

I thus have concluded that the yoke passage (Matthew 11:28-30) is part of this larger theme. I just don’t know what to make of it.

The Role of the Ruling Elder in the Local Church

A Survey of the PCA Book of Church Order

Introduction

The office of Ruling Elder is “one of dignity and usefulness” vital to the life of the church. Though the importance of the office is undisputed, the particulars of the service rendered are less clear among many who would fulfill the office with diligence. It is my hope that this small paper offers focus and clarity to discussions of the role and its associated duties. I am particularly interested in providing a summary of the ongoing and regular duties Ruling Elders are to provide the church in which they serve. By saying “regular and ongoing” I seek to delineate duties of a more frequent and predictable nature, rather than those duties that are performed only infrequently at a non-regular interval such as censure and discipline. Though I will not seek to ascertain a full view of the duties of the Session or other infrequent duties, I will try to use input from the full realm of the office to better inform the regular duties of Ruling Elders as individuals.

Methodology

I will survey the various sections in the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) Book of Church Order (BCO) from which conclusions may be drawn regarding the regular duty of Ruling Elders to a local church. The conclusions will then be studied to better understand the role and its various requirements. Though BCO Chapter 8 will figure prominently in my analysis, I will also include numerous other sections in the BCO. In all instances, emphasis in bold is mine. Each initial conclusion will be numbered as it is identified (Cxx), with the full number listed after the survey is complete. By then studying the conclusions collectively, I hope to provisionally identify a core set of duties appropriate to all Ruling Elders.

One disclaimer is in order. I do not pretend that my examination of the BCO will result in objective conclusions distinct from any subjective interpretation. Because my goal is to derive focused statements from the BCO on the role of Ruling Elder, I will necessarily summarize the material I am examining. In so doing, it may be that a particular summary offered differs from the particular way another person might choose to summarize the same material. It is my hope that the scope and general shape of my conclusions appear sound and compelling, even if particular details vary from the reader’s expectations.

Survey of the BCO

8-1. This office is one of dignity and usefulness. The man who fills it has in Scripture different titles expressive of his various duties. As he has the oversight of the flock of Christ, he is termed bishop or pastor. As it is his duty to be grave and prudent, an example to the flock, and to govern well in the house and Kingdom of Christ, he is termed presbyter or elder. As he expounds the Word, and by sound doctrine both exhorts and convinces the gainsayer, he is termed teacher. These titles do not indicate different grades of office, but all describe one and the same office.

Individual elders may be aptly described with different titles that point to the individual elders various duties. Thus, (C01) the existence of various titles for elders is not indicative in and of itself of a division of labor among the elders, where some are overseers and others shepherds. The distinction between Teaching Elder and Ruling Elder ultimately does lead to a differentiation of duties based on calling and giftedness. However, my concern in C01 is to note that such distinctions are not created within the role of Ruling Elder simply by the existence varying titles tied to related duties.

8-2. He that fills this office should possess a competency of human learning and be blameless in life, sound in the faith and apt to teach. He should exhibit a sobriety and holiness of life becoming the Gospel. He should rule his own house well and should have a good report of them that are outside the Church.

As section 8-2 focuses on the requirements of the office, I have not drawn from it any specific conclusions regarding the duties of the office. As we will see, those requirements tied to specific duties are highlighted in other parts of the BCO.

8-3. It belongs to the office of elder, both severally and jointly, to watch diligently over the flock committed to their charge, that no corruption of doctrine or of morals enter therein. They must exercise government and discipline, and take oversight not only of the spiritual interests of the particular church, but also the Church generally when called thereunto. They should visit the people at their homes, especially the sick. They should instruct the ignorant, comfort the mourner, nourish and guard the children of the church. They should set a worthy example to the flock entrusted to their care by their zeal to evangelize the unconverted and make disciples. All those duties which private Christians are bound to discharge by the law of love are especially incumbent upon them by divine vocation, and are to be discharged as official duties. They should pray with and for the people, being careful and diligent in seeking the fruit of the preached Word among the flock.

(C02) An elder’s duties must ensure his ability to maintain a diligent watch over the members of the congregation. (C03) The exercise of government and discipline is to promote the spiritual interests of the congregation. (C04) Visiting people in their homes, instructing the ignorant, giving comfort, praying with and for the people, nourishing and guarding the children, and evangelizing in an exemplary way are all duties of the elder.

8-8. As there were in the Church under the law, elders of the people for the government thereof, so in the Gospel Church, Christ has furnished others besides ministers of the Word with gifts and commission to govern when called thereunto, which are called ruling elders.

8-9. Elders being of one class of office, ruling elders possess the same authority and eligibility to office in the courts of the Church as teaching elders. They should, moreover, cultivate zealously their own aptness to teach the Bible and should improve every opportunity of doing so.

(C05) Ruling elders are to wholeheartedly seek to cultivate and improve their aptness to teach at every opportunity.

3-2. Ecclesiastical power, which is wholly spiritual, is twofold. The officers exercise it sometimes severally, as in preaching the Gospel, administering the Sacraments, reproving the erring, visiting the sick, and comforting the afflicted, which is the power of order; and they exercise it sometimes jointly in Church courts, after the form of judgment, which is the power of jurisdiction.

(C06) Certain duties are performed by elders as elders (power of order), while others are reserved for elders as a ruling body (power of jurisdiction).

6-3. All baptized persons are entitled to the watchful care, instruction and government of the church, even though they are adults and have made no profession of their faith in Christ.

(C07) Elders are to play a role in the watchful care and instruction of all baptized persons.

12-5. The church Session is charged with maintaining the spiritual government of the church, for which purpose it has power:

a. To inquire into the knowledge, principles and Christian conduct of the church members under its care; to censure those found delinquent; to see that parents do not neglect to present their children for Baptism; to receive members into the communion of the Church; to remove them for just cause; to grant letters of dismissal to other churches, which when given to parents, shall always include the names of their noncommuning baptized children;

b. To examine, ordain, and install ruling elders and deacons on their election by the church, and to require these officers to devote themselves to their work; to examine the records of the proceedings of the deacons; to approve and adopt the budget;

c. To approve actions of special importance affecting church property;

d. To call congregational meetings when necessary; to establish and control Sunday schools and Bible classes with special reference to the children of the church; to establish and control all special groups in the church such as Men in the Church, Women in the Church and special Bible study groups; to promote World missions; to promote obedience to the Great Commission in its totality at home and abroad; to order collections for pious uses;

e. To exercise, in accordance with the Directory for Worship, authority over the time and place of the preaching of the Word and the administration of the Sacraments, over all other religious services, over the music in the services, and over the uses to which the church building and associated properties may be put; to take the oversight of the singing in the public worship of God; to assemble the people for worship when there is no minister; to determine the best measures for promoting the spiritual interests of the Church and congregation;

f. To observe and carry out the lawful injunctions of the higher courts; and to appoint representatives to the higher courts, who shall, on their return, make report of their diligence.

As this list of responsibilities is assigned to the Session, we therefore know that the associated duties are based on the power of jurisdiction rather than the power of order. Thus, though individual elders may have delegated responsibilities that focus on such responsibilities, the authority originates and is maintained by the Session, not the individual elder. (C08) The Session’s oversight includes: the spiritual well-being of congregation; processing ruling elders and deacons; the Board of Deacons; the budget; the church property (at a high-level); Bible instruction; special church groups; collections for pious use; and public worship. (C09) The Session is to promote: World missions; the Great Commission; and the spiritual interests of the Church and congregation. (C10) These responsibilities given to the Session are associated with the power of jurisdiction, indicating that although individual elders may serve in varying capacities to fulfill these duties, the authority implied therein derives from the Session as a body.

28-2. The home and the Church should also make special provision for instructing the children in the Bible and in the church Catechisms. To this end Sessions should establish and conduct under their authority Sunday schools and Bible classes, and adopt such other methods as may be found helpful. The Session shall encourage the parents of the Church to guide their children in the catechizing and disciplining of them in the Christian religion.

(C11) Special emphasis is placed on the Sessions oversight of instructing and training children.

List of Conclusions

C01: The existence of various titles for elders is not indicative in and of itself of a division of labor among the elders, where some are overseers and others shepherds.
C02: An elder’s duties must ensure his ability to maintain a diligent watch over the members of the congregation.
C03: The exercise of government and discipline is to promote the spiritual interests of the congregation.
C04: Visiting people in their homes, instructing the ignorant, giving comfort, praying with and for the people, nourishing and guarding the children, and evangelizing in an exemplary way are all duties of the elder.
C05: Ruling elders are to wholeheartedly seek to cultivate and improve their aptness to teach at every opportunity.
C06: Certain duties are performed by elders as elders (power of order), while others are reserved for elders as a ruling body (power of jurisdiction).
C07: Elders are to play a role in the watchful care and instruction of all baptized persons.
C08: The Session’s oversight includes: the spiritual well-being of congregation; processing ruling elders and deacons; the Board of Deacons; the budget; the church property (at a high-level); Bible instruction; special church groups; collections for pious use; and public worship.
C09: The Session is to promote: World missions; the Great Commission; and the spiritual interests of the Church and congregation.
C10: These responsibilities given to the Session are associated with the power of jurisdiction, indicating that although individual elders may serve in varying capacities to fulfill these duties, the authority implied therein derives from the Session as a body.
C11: Special emphasis is placed on the Sessions oversight of instructing and training children.

Provisional Analysis

The overriding emphasis in the conclusions above is the oversight of the spiritual well-being of the congregation, with special emphasis on the children (C02, C03, C04, C07, C08, C09, C11). The emphasis is applied to both the individual elders and the Session as a whole. As C03 states, two of the three sections in the BCO (Form of Government and Rules of Church Discipline) find their end in just such spiritual growth. Though unstated in that particular place, the third and final section of the BCO (The Directory for the Worship of God) is also intimately related to the self-same goal (see BCO 12-5.e). Thus, we see that the entire BCO is designed to promote the spiritual well-being of congregants in a church. Ruling Elders are to feel responsible for the spiritual interests of those under their care, to be watchful, and to be active in promoting such well-being.

Three points are worth considering in light of this overarching principle. First, language typically associated with the title Shepherd is found throughout the BCO in association with Ruling Elders. The Ruling Elders are to be actively watchful over the congregants, calling to mind the phrase “as shepherds watched their flocks by night” from the Gospel accounts of the incarnation. The Biblical shepherd, from whom the title gains its force, is actively engaged in the life of the flock, calling the sheep by name. As we have seen, each individual elder is expected to participate in the lives of congregants with a “watchful” outlook (C02, C04, C07).

Second, great emphasis is placed on teaching. In fact, each Ruling Elder is to demonstrate a zealousness in cultivating their “aptness to teach” and to take every opportunity to develop such gifts and abilities. This strong statement regarding teaching immediately follows the list of duties specific to Teaching Elders and is thus designed to ensure that Ruling Elders do not fall into the error of believing teaching is the duty of elders in general but not necessary to each individual elder. No such allowance is envisioned in the BCO that I can tell.

Third, both stated and implied in numerous places is the oversight elders are to collectively exercise in the Church to ensure the gifts God has distributed among the congregants are used to build up the Church (C03, C04, C07, C08, C09, C10, C11). Thus, though individual Ruling Elders might vary in the specific oversight they offer in the Church’s ministries, the general expectation is that each Ruling Elder would play an important role in such oversight, and that collectively they would wield appropriate authority to achieve such aims.

The Big Picture

Based on the above survey and analysis, I would sketch the office of Ruling Elder with the following lines of thought:

1. Ruling Elders, along with Teaching Elders, serve by governing the church for the spiritual well-being of the congregation.

2. The rule and authority of individual Ruling Elders is to be always informed and shaped by the activities of shepherding and teaching. That is, shepherding and teaching provide the required foundation to support each Ruling Elder’s contribution to the governance of the church.

a. Shepherding and teaching do not function solely as distinct ends in and of themselves, though they are necessary for the spiritual welfare of the church.

b. Rather, in the case of the Ruling Elder, shepherding and teaching allow the Ruling Elder to govern the church well, while simultaneously providing at least a subset of the needed ministries within the life of the church.

3. The Session is to use the full resources of the congregation, in so much as God has distributed good gifts among the congregation, to disciple and watch over the congregation.

a. Though all members of the Session are to be actively engaged in teaching and shepherding, such a requirement does not imply that all teaching and shepherding of the congregation must come from the Session.

b. In fact, such a view would appear to contradict the role of oversight the Session has in using the many gifts of the congregation, and would provide a logistical nightmare in a large church. In a congregation of one thousand, the Session would either have too many Ruling Elders to rule effectively (in the hopes of having enough manpower to provide all the teaching and shepherding), or would have too few Ruling Elders to provide all the teaching and shepherding needed (in the hopes of keeping the Session small enough to effectively rule).

Final Thought

It is my hope that the picture I have sketched of the office of Ruling Elder is helpful in focusing the efforts, thoughts, and prayers of Ruling Elders as they seek to serve the church to God’s glory. To be honest, the duties of the office are daunting. Yet I believe that the recognition of the high calling of the office is helpful in so far as it reminds us that in our weakness God is strong. May we all clearly see our own poverty and weakness so that God’s blessings may be made known in His church.

We recently covered the Levitical sacrifices in our small group. To close our discussion, I had us read through Hebrews 9 & 10. Shortly after, it struck me that elements of the imagery carry forward into Hebrews 11 & 12. Here’s the gist of my thoughts:

• God’s glory cloud hovered over the tabernacle (Exodus 40:36 among others).
• Leviticus 1 details the whole burnt offering, which states that the animal burned on the alter is a pleasing aroma to God. As Leithart has argued in A House For My Name, the emphasis is not on the destructive fire, but rather the process of turning to smoke.
• Thus, you can picture the animal substitute being, in a sense, glorified and rising as smoke to join the glory cloud.
• Hebrews 9 & 10 extensively discuss the sacrifices and their import.
• Hebrews 11 then describes the faith of saints who have gone on to glory.
• Hebrews 12 opens with a reference to this “great cloud of witnesses.” In the context, it now seems to me that this is a reference to the imagery engaged in chapters 9 & 10 and serves to join chapters 9 through 11 into a whole. These saints have passed through death and abide with God in the cloud. The use of the word ‘cloud’ of all possible words to allude to a multitude seems too closely aligned to the preceding passages to be a mere accident of word usage.
• Later in Hebrews 12 we are told that we have come to “Mount Zion, the heavenly Jerusalem” and not simply a “mountain that can be touched and that is burning with fire; to darkness, gloom and storm.”
• Here, too, we find a reference to the glory cloud, as Hebrews 12 is referring back to Exodus 19, which states that “On the morning of the third day there was thunder and lightning, with a thick cloud over the mountain, and a very loud trumpet blast.”

I find it interesting that the thematic use of the cloud comes toward the end of Hebrews. Anyone out there know if the book as a whole is structured to follow the sacrificial rite (laying of hands, slaughter, presentation of blood, turn to smoke, fellowship meal)?

It seems to me that many of the people involved in various discussion regarding justification by faith, the proper place of works in our lives and doctrine, the nature of the final judgment, etc. have a fundamental difference in perspective that hinders communication. At issue, I believe, is one’s understanding/application of God’s sovereignty.

The folks that I have read on the issue all agree, as far as I can tell, with a view of God’s sovereignty as found in the WCF chapter III. But the stance assumed on account of that view, and the corollary views of man’s free will and the historic means that God in his providence ordains along with the ends, seem greatly at odds and is perhaps a root cause of some of the disagreements on the issue of works.

In my opinion, the wrong way to view God’s sovereignty can be appropriately called Bobsled Sovereignty. This is quite a popular view in reformed churches as far as I can tell. Bobsled Sovereignty basically affirms that because God is sovereign, it is the duty of man to basically get in the bobsled and go for a ride down that twisty, but always linear and unforking, path of God’s will. Such a stance, I believe, minimizes the historic dynamic of human involvement and pushes people’s thinking toward the decrees of God at every turn, though these decrees are confessed to be unknown. It also has the odd effect, over time, of pushing God’s wisdom toward the realm of human comprehension, since his wisdom and hidden decree forms the bedrock of such thinking.

A more robust view of God’s sovereignty, in my opinion, was held by Moses among others.

Exodus 32:7-14

7 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Go down, because your people, whom you brought up out of Egypt, have become corrupt. 8 They have been quick to turn away from what I commanded them and have made themselves an idol cast in the shape of a calf. They have bowed down to it and sacrificed to it and have said, ‘These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of Egypt.’

9 “I have seen these people,” the Lord said to Moses, “and they are a stiff-necked people. 10 Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them. Then I will make you into a great nation.”

11 But Moses sought the favor of the Lord his God. “O Lord ,” he said, “why should your anger burn against your people, whom you brought out of Egypt with great power and a mighty hand? 12 Why should the Egyptians say, ‘It was with evil intent that he brought them out, to kill them in the mountains and to wipe them off the face of the earth’? Turn from your fierce anger; relent and do not bring disaster on your people. 13 Remember your servants Abraham, Isaac and Israel, to whom you swore by your own self: ‘I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and I will give your descendants all this land I promised them, and it will be their inheritance forever.’ ” 14 Then the Lord relented and did not bring on his people the disaster he had threatened.

Here’s my point. If Moses had bought into the Bobsled Sovereignty school of thought, here’s how verse 11 might have read:

“Then Moses replied, ‘Oh Lord, I am ready and willing to copulate frequently that I might have many children and build this nation that you have decreed. I have heard you speak from your own mouth, and know that all you say is decreed from everlasting and must come to pass.'”

So, all you folks involved in such debates, is it not possible that such a view would hinder someone from understanding your points regarding works, if that person has a view of sovereignty that hinders them from even understanding the historic involvement of man in the decrees of God?

In I Corinthians 1:17 Paul writes “For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel–not with words of human wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.” This is said right after he states that he baptized very few of the Corinthians.

Now fast-forward to I Corinthians 3:5-9 which says:

“What, after all, is Apollos? And what is Paul? Only servants, through whom you came to believe–as the Lord has assigned to each his task. I planted the seed, Apollos watered it, but God made it grow. So neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything, but only God, who makes things grow. The man who plants and the man who waters have one purpose, and each will be rewarded according to his own labor. For we are God’s fellow workers; you are God’s field, God’s building.”

In this quote, Paul assigns himself the role of planting a seed. We thus have a correlation between preaching the gospel and planting seeds, which exactly corresponds to the relationship established in the parable of the four soils between the gospel and seed in its farming motif. Notice then that Paul goes on to say that Apollos watered, in a context in which he has already explicitly said he did not baptize. It would follow then that watering corresponds to baptizing in the agricultural analogy that is in play. Paul preached the gospel <==> sowed seed on a field. Apollos watered <==> baptized them into the church.

Numerous thoughts leap to mind. Here’s a couple of them.

1. The parables are not isolated snippets of imagery with only one point and no correspondence to larger imagery that carries through the Bible. For instance, a well-developed agricultural motif is developed based on the fact that man is made of dirt, has seed sown in him, is watered by God, and is to bear fruit. This basic pattern (or portions of it) is central to stories, parables, exhortations, etc. For instance, Hebrews 6:7-8 comes to mind: “Land that drinks in the rain often falling on it and that produces a crop useful to those for whom it is farmed receives the blessing of God. But land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless and is in danger of being cursed. In the end it will be burned.” Thus, in some instances, one might find the clearest expression of a particular motif in a parable. Using that motif to understand other passages is not, in and of itself, an improper use of analogy, even if such a use goes beyond the one single point the parable is presumed to teach by those who approach the parables in such a way.

2. Baptism is an ordinary step in salvation, but does not ensure ultimate salvation. We hear the word, we are watered in baptism, but as Hebrews 6 reminds us, we must grow the fruits of salvation and not the thorns of apostasy. Lest any readers be confused, I am not trying to say anything more than, for instance, the Westminster Confession of Faith states when it puts baptism as the means of entering the church and the church as the place in which salvation is ordinarily found. Rather, I am trying to say it in a slightly different way, in keeping with the language of scripture that I have cited.

I need to stop here and get back to work. Perhaps I’ll have the chance to put up a few more thoughts later.