<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baptismal Efficacy &amp; the Reformed Tradition: Past, Present, &amp; Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future/comment-page-1#comment-10757</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future#comment-10757</guid>
		<description>Baptism is pure liquid gospel. I love it :)

My 8th child will be baptized this next Lord&#039;s Day. Frequently reminding myself, my wife and children of God&#039;s pledges and requirements made at our baptisms has been integral to our family&#039;s sanctification. May the Lord bless you for your labors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baptism is pure liquid gospel. I love it :)</p>
<p>My 8th child will be baptized this next Lord&#8217;s Day. Frequently reminding myself, my wife and children of God&#8217;s pledges and requirements made at our baptisms has been integral to our family&#8217;s sanctification. May the Lord bless you for your labors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wehmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future/comment-page-1#comment-5514</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wehmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future#comment-5514</guid>
		<description>A good article but I fear both sacraments are terribly misunderstood so long as they are disconnected from the Holy Church (I use that title aa a Calvinist). To repeat myself: Unless the nature of the ministry of the Holy Church and a recovery of the Reformed view of the role of the Pastor (celebrant) discussions such as this have no natural linkage with the life of the believer.
Much has to be done to recover an ecclesiology worthy of our Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good article but I fear both sacraments are terribly misunderstood so long as they are disconnected from the Holy Church (I use that title aa a Calvinist). To repeat myself: Unless the nature of the ministry of the Holy Church and a recovery of the Reformed view of the role of the Pastor (celebrant) discussions such as this have no natural linkage with the life of the believer.<br />
Much has to be done to recover an ecclesiology worthy of our Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elijah</title>
		<link>http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future/comment-page-1#comment-5422</link>
		<dc:creator>elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future#comment-5422</guid>
		<description>Its amazing that you went to great lenght to use reformed men to say what the reformed church today teaches  thankfully we who dont believe in  popes dont think calvin or wright...etc were &quot;popes&quot;...  yet you  fail to see pauls responce to the old sigh has the same result with the new one Roman 4 ...You would think spending 2 chapters on the suject, would be enought. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its amazing that you went to great lenght to use reformed men to say what the reformed church today teaches  thankfully we who dont believe in  popes dont think calvin or wright&#8230;etc were &#8220;popes&#8221;&#8230;  yet you  fail to see pauls responce to the old sigh has the same result with the new one Roman 4 &#8230;You would think spending 2 chapters on the suject, would be enought. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Lusk</title>
		<link>http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future/comment-page-1#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Lusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornes.org/theologia/rich-lusk/baptismal-efficacy-the-reformed-tradition-past-present-future#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Hey!  I have the same name!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  I have the same name!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
