<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If someone has more time than me and their Van Til books at hand&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hornes.org/mark/2008/05/05/if-someone-has-more-time-than-me-and-their-van-til-books-at-hand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hornes.org/mark/2008/05/05/if-someone-has-more-time-than-me-and-their-van-til-books-at-hand/</link>
	<description>&#34;Take me out to the black. Tell &#039;em I ain&#039;t coming back.&#34; -- The Ballad of Serenity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:13:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.hornes.org/mark/2008/05/05/if-someone-has-more-time-than-me-and-their-van-til-books-at-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-204030</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=2710#comment-204030</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if I can explain the difference in content.  I think the point is that we need to be careful how we speak of Adam&#039;s eschatological glorification as a &quot;justification.&quot;  Sometimes, this seems to smudge into the idea that Adam had to become righteous, when he already was righteous.  Degrading from &quot;righteous&quot; descriptions of Adam, to &quot;innocent&quot; descriptions makes me worry if there is a hidden or even unthinking agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I can explain the difference in content.  I think the point is that we need to be careful how we speak of Adam&#8217;s eschatological glorification as a &#8220;justification.&#8221;  Sometimes, this seems to smudge into the idea that Adam had to become righteous, when he already was righteous.  Degrading from &#8220;righteous&#8221; descriptions of Adam, to &#8220;innocent&#8221; descriptions makes me worry if there is a hidden or even unthinking agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pentamom</title>
		<link>http://www.hornes.org/mark/2008/05/05/if-someone-has-more-time-than-me-and-their-van-til-books-at-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-197770</link>
		<dc:creator>pentamom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=2710#comment-197770</guid>
		<description>Can you explain the distinction between wholly innocent and actually righteous?  It doesn&#039;t make sense to me; since sin has the aspects of both commission and omission, then someone who is entirely without sin must have actively positive qualities (i.e., the opposite of sins of omission) -- how can that be distinguished from righteousness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you explain the distinction between wholly innocent and actually righteous?  It doesn&#8217;t make sense to me; since sin has the aspects of both commission and omission, then someone who is entirely without sin must have actively positive qualities (i.e., the opposite of sins of omission) &#8212; how can that be distinguished from righteousness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
