What does it mean when someone’s orthodoxy would be impeccable except that the person in question is claiming that certain words can be used by the orthodox in certain ways that jive with, subtantiate, or even extend the influence of orthodoxy–words that have also been used by the unorthodox?

Why it means we can cast all manner of suspicion and even outright accusation upon the perpetrator. “Guilt by associaton” is no longer a fallacy; it is the sacred road to truth.